tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15192117.post89429137511379062..comments2023-04-09T07:53:24.930-04:00Comments on iWoman.: “Leave it all to me - I will do the right thing.”iWomanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03602049874047411452noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15192117.post-81169960967022611172008-12-24T16:24:00.000-05:002008-12-24T16:24:00.000-05:00"Arletta has made this into a Surrogacy Case it wa..."Arletta has made this into a Surrogacy Case it was only a divorce." <BR/><BR/>How so? He was the one that refused to sign the order to release his rights to the baby. He said, "I don't understand why I have to sign, that baby has nothing to do with me." In Kentucky, the law says that he was the legal father unless he signed the release form. By not signing, he was in affect assuming responsibility of the baby. Seems like a strange thing to do for someone that just wanted a divorce don't you think?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15192117.post-56774989970938118362008-05-16T21:33:00.000-04:002008-05-16T21:33:00.000-04:00Also The Divorce was only final Feb.13-2008 Was Bo...Also The Divorce was only final Feb.13-2008 Was Bobby Jo Arness there at court for the divorce NO she just had a baby 4/25/2008Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15192117.post-46977179673452983952008-05-16T21:20:00.000-04:002008-05-16T21:20:00.000-04:00Hi IwomanYou are only getting two side's.Mrs Mitc...Hi Iwoman<BR/>You are only getting two side's.Mrs Mitchard and Arletta Adkins Bendschneider (Bobby Jo Arness) Arletta's Husband said no from the getgo her words well i am going to do this with you or with out you. He went along with her because he was thinking of his two little children.Arletta has made this into a Surrogacy Case it was only a divorce.There is lot more to this.what you read i can see why you were angry.This story is not true.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com