Saturday, August 25, 2007

Books Read, 2007 (#16 - 17)

# We Don't Need Another Wave: Dispatches from the Next Generation of Feminists by Melody Berger (Editor)
I love feminist books that are modern and have a collection of articles on a variety of topics written by different people, and this book is no exception. Having said that, though, I do have a minor quibble. A lot of the articles seemed v. "me me me" orientated, and there's nothing wrong with that, per se, but I (mostly) would rather read about more than just one person's experience in something. Like, I don't care how someone started her Web site or sticker-selling business.

...and His Lovely Wife: A Memoir from the Woman Beside the Man by Connie Schultz
I complained about this book a post ago, but it got better and I finished it. I prob. exaggerated, but there definitely is still quite the feeling of "oh, we love each other so much," blahblahblah, which, really, shouldn't we be happy that there is a happy marriage out there? She adores her husband. Lucky her.

Books Read, 2007 (#16 - 17)

# We Don't Need Another Wave: Dispatches from the Next Generation of Feminists by Melody Berger (Editor)
I love feminist books that are modern and have a collection of articles on a variety of topics written by different people, and this book is no exception. Having said that, though, I do have a minor quibble. A lot of the articles seemed v. "me me me" orientated, and there's nothing wrong with that, per se, but I (mostly) would rather read about more than just one person's experience in something. Like, I don't care how someone started her Web site or sticker-selling business.

...and His Lovely Wife: A Memoir from the Woman Beside the Man by Connie Schultz
I complained about this book a post ago, but it got better and I finished it. I prob. exaggerated, but there definitely is still quite the feeling of "oh, we love each other so much," blahblahblah, which, really, shouldn't we be happy that there is a happy marriage out there? She adores her husband. Lucky her.

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Disappointing.

I've been reading ...and His Lovely Wife by Connie Schultz.

I adore her. I really do. But I don't know if I can finish this book! It's too much, oh, I love my husband, oh, our lives are just perfect, oh, he never does a wrong thing. Okay. She doesn't express it quite that way, but those are definitely impressions a reader gets. And it's unbearable, really.

I'll give it a few more chapters, but if it doesn't improve, I'm done.

P.S. This computer is so slow.

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Zzz.

I started to write an entry about the winery tour I went on today (and all of the wonderful food, smothered in wine sauces...) but I am too tired. I will write this tidbit: never eat grapes that aren't ripe! I knew unripe grapes caused stomach aches, as it has happened to me before, but I couldn't help myself. I paid for it, though. Possibly it wasn't the grapes, though, as I have had stomach cramps for 24/7 for about two days now.

Well, I'm going to read some of ...And His Lovely Wife by Connie Schultz now.

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

"I walk on concrete / I walk on sand / But I can't find / A safe place to stand."

Linked from The Daily Telegraph:

    Man cleared of sleepwalk sex with 15-year-old

    August 08, 2007 01:00am

    A BRITISH RAF mechanic who claimed he was sleepwalking when he had sex with a 15-year-old girl has been cleared of rape.

    Senior Aircraftsman Kenneth Ecott, 26, wept after a jury took two hours to find he was not responsible for his actions.

    Mr Ecott did not deny having sex with the girl, but said he had no memory of it happening.

    Instead he insisted he had a condition known as sexsomnia in which sufferers carry out indecent acts in their sleep.

    It was this affliction that made him climb naked on top of the girl at a friend's birthday party sleepover in Poole, Dorset, the Bournemouth Crown Court heard.

    The girl screamed when she awoke.

    Mr Ecott was said to have confessed to the girl's family and apologised for having sex with her.

    But when he was arrested in his barracks at RAF Brize Norton, Oxfordshire, he told police he was prone to sleepwalking.

    He claimed to have been in a state of automatism while with the girl, meaning he was not aware of his actions.

    His girlfriend told the court that he had fondled her in bed while asleep.
I'm only posting this article because look at how often this shit happens. Also, this account is so incomplete. Was there a, I don't know, doctor who said there's even such a thing as "sexsomnia"?

And, okay, he's cleared of "rape," but what about the fact that the girl was underage? I believe the age of consent in the U.K. is still 16. But, wait, let's not forget about the judge who thinks it's okay to rape 10-year-old girls as long as they look 16. So just par the course for the legal system there, I reckon.

Heads up!

I think it's time to contact my representatives, yep.

From The New York Times:

    Ohio Pushes Added Leave for Maternity

    By BOB DRIEHAUS
    Published: August 12, 2007

    CINCINNATI, Aug. 11 — The Ohio Civil Rights Commission is pushing for a broad expansion of benefits for pregnant workers.

    If its proposals are adopted, Ohio would join 18 states that require employers to offer maternity leaves that exceed those mandated by the federal Family and Medical Leave Act. That law offers workers at businesses with 50 or more employees 12 weeks of unpaid leave for infant care.

    Expectant mothers must have worked for a business for a year, or 1,250 hours, to be eligible.

    The Ohio commission has proposed that businesses with four or more employees offer 12 weeks of unpaid maternity leave to pregnant employees, regardless of how long they have worked for the businesses.

    Workers not eligible under the federal law would need a doctor’s orders to qualify.

    The commission is revising its proposal after business groups said the rules would hurt small businesses and the state’s economy. The revisions are expected to go next month to a State Senate and House committee that could approve the rules without further action by the Legislature.

    Jeanine P. Donaldson, who this year became the first woman to lead the commission, said the law on maternity leave needed to ensure that more women were protected against discrimination.

    Ms. Donaldson said she was willing to bend on the number of weeks of guaranteed leave but hoped to preserve the stipulation that length of service would not affect eligibility.

    “I don’t think a woman can decide when to get pregnant,” Ms. Donaldson said. “To choose motherhood over livelihood, I don’t think that is what the legislators had in mind.”

    Business groups say the expanded leave would damage the economy. “There’s really no reason to change the current law,” said Tony Fiore, director of labor and human resources policy for the Ohio Chamber of Commerce.

    Requiring small businesses to hold open positions would be a hardship, he said, as would the immediate eligibility for new workers at large corporations.

    Ty Pine, legislative director for the Ohio branch of the National Federation of Independent Businesses, said the market was doing a good job of establishing reasonable maternity leaves for workers and businesses.

    “We would like to maintain the current practice of reasonable time off without mandating specifically,” Mr. Pine said.

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

Various musing.

The other day I encountered an information booth run by an anti-women’s rights group (they proclaimed themselves as "pro-life," or some other rot).

Shock of shocks, the only people sitting at the booth were four old, white men. I’m glad they’re on top of the whole making-my-decisions-for-me thing.

Ugh. I would love to start some sort of feminist group in this county, to counter this bullshit, but I have no idea what we would do. Also, while I firmly believe there would be women who would want to join, I think it would be hard to reach them and hard to inform them and get them to actually come to events/meetings. I wouldn’t want to run this group, but I want to be a member of it. I think we have a League of Women Voters, though. And Zonta, of course. But they aren’t really the same thing as a "feminist" group. It's really not such a bad idea; I could create a Web site and facebook group...

***

I had intended to register as an Independent in the next primary election, but, as usual when I try to make this decision, something stops me. I want to be part of a community! I want to attend events like Yearly Kos. I want to volunteer for someone’s campaign. But I can’t if I’m an Independent (well, I can, but..). There’s no sense of community if you’re an "Independent" - it’s inherent in the word. Yes, I am disappointed in the (majority) of the current crop of elected Democrats. But declaring myself as an "Independent" isn’t going to change anything (well, it is taking a stance, though, and declaring my frustration). The most prominent Democrat activists, such as the bloggers at AMERICAblog and DailyKos, are liberal. It’s just hard to elect someone who is as liberal or progressive as us, because most people - Democrats and Republicans - are moderate. They don’t like extremes. The conservatives are better at getting extremists elected. They know how to band together, how to motivate their base. So, for now, I think it’s more important to stick together. Maybe.
 
***

P.S. Who knew? Someone to aspire to: Eleanor Smeal.

Reprehensible.

From Daily Feminist News:

    Air Force Woman Could Be Convicted in Her Own Rape

    8/10/2007 - A woman airman in the US Air Force who was allegedly raped by three of her male counterparts is being charged with indecent acts, according to an AP report. If convicted, the woman could face a year in prison, a pay cut, a bad-conduct discharge, and would even be registered as a sex offender, the woman's defense lawyers told the AP.

    Cassandra Hernandez, who was stationed with the Air Force in North Carolina, was allegedly assaulted six months ago while in another airman's room; she fled partially clothed, she said. After reporting the attack she received a medical examination, but declined to testify after she was allegedly interrogated by an Air Force defense attorney without her lawyer present. "The pressure of the judicial process was too much for me, and I felt like no one was looking out for my interests," Hernandez wrote to the AP. She was subsequently charged with one count of consuming alcohol as a minor (she admittedly was drinking the night in question) and one count of committing indecent acts.

    The Air Force Public Affairs division said that its investigation did not find sufficient evidence to support the woman's claims of sexual assault, reported KVUE, a Houston television station. The accused men were granted immunity from the sexual assault charges for their testimony against Hernandez in the US Air Force's case against her, KVUE further reported.

    Hernandez worries that the handling of her case will impact others in the Air Force as well. "Will other women come forward after a rape when they hear that this is how they may be treated?" she wrote in a letters to the US Congress and Texas Gov. Rick Perry, according to KVUE. "The process has almost been as painful as the rape."

    Hernandez is scheduled to begin court marshal on September 24.

    Media Resources: Associated Press 8/7/07; KVUE 8/1/07
Yes, because it's more important to bust a woman for underage drinking (!!!) than it is to prosecute two men for sexual assault! Immunity. Fucking immunity.

Tuesday, August 07, 2007

Disappointing, Apple.

"The new iMac. You can't be too thin. Or too powerful."

Possibly (probably/likely) they are trying to be satirical, playing on a cliche and whatnot, but I think they fail. The satire is weak. This ad feels out of place for Apple. Seriously, this is the best they could do?

Monday, August 06, 2007

The White Stripes, finally!

"White Americans, what?
Nothing better to do?
Why don't you kick yourself out?
You're an immigrant, too."
--The White Stripes, "Icky Thump"

I heart the White Stripes. I'm finally listening to their new album, Icky Thump. Yea! It's a bit strange, but that's par the course with the White Stripes.

I found my copy of Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism, and the Future by Jennifer Baumgardner and Amy Richards. It was in my dresser, with some other books from school. So, s0ja, you can borrow it, if you want. It's a must read, if only for the massive collection of feminist links and resources in the back. I've found a lot of great organizations through the list. Right now I'm going down the list, signing up for any free newsletters or mailing lists. For example, even though "we don't need another wave," ;), I just signed up at Third Wave Foundation. They have to be at the forefront of any news. I need to be more aware of current feminist activism. Disappointingly (for a number of reasons), a number of the links in the book are no longer active.

Sunday, August 05, 2007

What, no auto save?

Damn it.

I wrote an entry, clicked to submit it, and lame Safari crashed.

Ugh. A rotten feeling to realize I spent upteen minutes typing something, only to have it disappear.

I'm not going to re-type it right now.

Friday, August 03, 2007

A total *non* rec.

I received a free copy of Bright Lights, Big Ass: A Self-Indulgent, Surly, Ex-Sorority Girl's Guide to Why it Often Sucks in the City, or Who are These Idiots and Why Do They All Live Next Door to Me? by Jen Lancaster in the mail today (courtesy of Bzz Agent), and it seemed decent enough, so I started to read it.

The beginning was...mildly entertaining. I write "mildly" because I found the author (it's a memoir) to be a tad immature, self-centered, spoiled, etc. etc. But also amusing at times.

Her constant bashing of Carrie Bradshaw (of Sex and the City) annoyed me, though, especially since the basis seemed to be she's a liar, life in the city's not like that, blah blah blah, but I took her opinions with a grain of salt because, hello, she didn't seem to have a problem with watching the so-not-realistic Desperate Housewives.

But a greater annoyance was still to come.

Brace yourself.

She's a Republican.

I felt a bit twitchy at the mention of the Drudge Report, but I felt I could handle a book about a Republican, as long as she didn't mention her politics too much.

But no. The utter inanities kept coming.

From page 99: "If I could endure the fraternity party otherwise known as the Clinton administration, you can deal with President Churchy McJesus."

The fraternity party...? Okay, I don't agree with everything Clinton did during his presidency, but, please, let's compare his accomplishments to Bush's. And also, let's compare their failures. Who drove our country into the ground and is responsible for thousands of deaths? I'm thinking, not Clinton.

It gets better. She's a fan of Ann Coulter, watches Fox News regularly, and believes Sean Hannity deserves a raise.

Also?

From page 122: "I quickly revise my I Dig Any Famous Pit Bull Advocate stance, which previously gave passes to Rosie Perez, Vin Diesel, Michael J. Fox, and Jon Stewart..."

Uh. What's Michael J. Fox done that he needs a pass for, other than being pro-stem cell research, which, you know, could save his life? I'm sorry if him having a disease offends you so much...

But wait.

There are some real fighting words.

From page 212: "I pushed through a pack of tourists from Cleveland while rushing to the register to purchase my prize. Out of the way, you slack-jawed yokels..."

Well, fuck you.

Frankly, though, even though she proclaims to be a Republican, I find that she has little understanding of politics. I think she's quite naive/ignorant about the world outside of her self-absorbed bubble.

Anyway, we don't have to worry too much about her inflicting her ignorance on the rest of us:

From page 222: "The worst part was I realized I was far more likely to vote for an American Idol contestant than a government official, as evidenced by my not walking next door to vote in the last local election because it was raining."

Super.

I'm so not finishing this book.

Thursday, August 02, 2007

Movie recommendation!

I watched the most darling, movie yesterday: Miss Potter.

First off, it must be said that Renée Zellweger is the most talented actress of her era.

Second off, I never knew how fabulous Beatrix Potter was!

She was such a progressive, modern woman plucked down in the Victorian Era.

Britain owes her a great debt, because she donated 4,000 acres of land in the Lake District to a conservation group, having bought up all this farmland during her lifetime to protect it from developers. Can you imagine what this land would look like now if it weren't for her? Probably filled with shopping malls and McDonald's. Instead, it's a slice of beautiful nature for everyone to enjoy.

If you watch this movie, be prepared to cry (if you're a sap like me, that is). It's really quite a charming movie.

 

Books Read, 2007 (#11 - 15)

I haven't been updating my Books Read, 2007 list! I better write them down before I forget what I've read. I'm quite proud of my mix of fiction and nonfiction reads this year.

The Official Fahrenheit 9/11 Reader by Michael Moore
How can people ignore facts, is what I want to know.

Season of the Witch by Natasha Mostert
I won ten copies of this book for my book club. It was a lot better than I expected it to be, actually, but it stills reads a bit like a male fantasy.

# The Assault on Reason by Al Gore
I agree with so much of what Gore wrote, but at times this book read like someone's dissertation, it's not always accessible to the every reader.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows by J.K. Rowling
Finally! Ask my thoughts in person, if you want to know. Too long for here.

Mr. Monk and the Blue Flu by Lee Goldberg
This book was better than I expected it to be, because I think it's hard to translate Monk's behavior and quirks to text. I was leery about the book being from Natalie's point-of-view, because I'm not a huge fan of hers, but know I realize that it couldn't be done from any other way. An enjoyable mystery, but I don't know if I'd read another one in the series.

Saturday, July 07, 2007

#6 - 10

The Pact: True Love Story by Jodi Picoult
We read this novel for my book club in May. I can understand why Picoult is such a popular writer, but she's not to my tastes. I find her v. manipulative, v. deus ex machina. Also, this novel is so not a "love story." It's about a teenage couple, and the girl is found dead with a bullet wound to her head. The boy is on trial for murder, and he claims it was a suicide pact. The girl is basically the only sympathetic character in the entire novel.

# BITCHfest: Ten Years of Cultural Criticism from the Pages of Bitch Magazine edited by Lisa Jervis and Andi Zeisler
Highly recommended. I love that it's filled with articles about different topics, like puberty to media to slash to gender roles to stereotypes to basically anything. I loved it to pieces. I don't want to read an entire book about just one topic. A caveat: I wouldn't recommend it to someone brand new to feminism, because I think you have to have some understanding about women's history plus some understanding and recocognization of issues. For someone new to feminism, I would recommend the first feminist book I ever read: Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism, and the Future by Jennifer Baumgardner and Amy Richards.

Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics by bell hooks
I am so disappointed in this book. Most feminists I know, whose opinions I trust, highly recommended it. I came away with nothing, though. I felt like it was a Cliff Notes version of feminism. Chapters were two to four pages long on each topic, and I just don't think it delved into enough detail about anything.

The Innocent Man: Murder and Injustice in a Small Town by John Grisham
June's book club book. Nonfiction. It made everyone furious with the "justice" system.

Girls Rock!: Fifty Years of Women Making Music by Mina Carson, Tisa Lewis, and Susan M. Shaw
Yeah. I knew women have it hard in the music industry, but some of these stories were shocking. I found the book mostly boring, though. I don't care much about when people bought their first guitar, etc.

Books Read, 2007
Books Read, 2006
Books Read, 2005

I better start reading a heck of a lot more if I want to reach my goal of 50 books.

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

I hate the world today.

I thought nothing could upset me more than the article "Girl provoked pedophile - judge," but watching Bowling for Columbine for the first time comes close.

Did you know the NRA held a pro-gun rally in Denver, Co. ten days after Columbine? Yes, you have the "right" to meet, Mr. Heston, but it doesn't mean you have to let common decency fall by the wayside. How many years ago was Columbine, and gun control has gotten more lax?

Every day I hate the world more and can't see an end to this madness. It's okay to rape a 10-year-old if she looks 16, and it's okay to own automatic weapons that serve no purpose other than killing someone.

Nothing changes.

Anyway, I'm off to finish watching the movie now.

Monday, June 25, 2007

And my point is so made.

Can you distinguish pricey art from kids' paintings? A quiz.

Saturday, June 23, 2007

Trojan.

A quiz!

On CBS and Fox, sex is not allowed to sell:

a) Hamburgers
b) Condoms
c) Cars
d) Cleaning supplies
e) Web sites
f) Beer

If you chose "b," you are correct!

CBS and Fox are refusing to air a Trojan condom ad.

Their reasoning (from this article in The NY Times)?:

    Fox said that it had rejected the spot because, “Contraceptive advertising must stress health-related uses rather than the prevention of pregnancy.”

    In its rejection, CBS wrote, “while we understand and appreciate the humor of this creative, we do not find it appropriate for our network even with late-night-only restrictions.”
Because a) preventing pregnancy isn't "health-related" and b) the Christian fundamentals are so dim they will forget that condoms also prevent pregnancy just because an ad doesn't mention it and thus they will forget why they don't approve of condoms?

Sunday, June 17, 2007

Baseball.

Note to self: no day baseball games.

Except I'm going to another one today.

It was hot yesterday at the Indians vs. Braves game. The sun was shining right on us the entire game. I found it hard to concentrate. Everyone got free bucket hats, so they were nice and useful. The Indians need to get rid of that Chief Wahoo logo, though. Geez.

We had pretty good seats, though, right by the Braves bull pen and left field foul line. I enjoyed watching John Smoltz of the Braves warm up - he's such a legend. Only three players are left from when we saw them 12 years ago in Atlanta: Andruw Jones, Chipper Jones, and Smoltz. Eddie Perez, who was always Greg Maddox's (another legend) catcher is now a bull pen coach. That's cool. When I waved to him, he waved back.

The Indians lost 6 - 2. : ( When the score was 2 - 2, the Indians second baseman fumbled the ball a bit on aan easy play, and the Braves hitter was safe at first. The guy sitting in front of us threw down his hat in digust. What an overreaction! My mom and I busted out laughing. The Indians got the third out on the next play, so come down. I get pissed at home watching a game, but it's not like this game is do-or-die.

There were a lot of Braves fans there. They both have the same colors, the red and blue, so it was hard to tell who was rooting for who at times!

And then our section was on the big Scantron for an uncomfortably long time! Smile and wave?

Friday, June 15, 2007

: (

There's always next year!: A Cleveland fan's mantra.

Seriously, though, the Cavs will be back in the Finals and eventually they will win. It took Jordan six years (also my mantra)!

I am going to the Indians game tomorrow, also prob. on Sunday, too.

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Smart Women...

Last weekend, while we were at a bookstore in Legacy Village, I saw an absolutely darling collection of office products called "Smart Women." All of them had retro drawings of women and slogans like, "Smart Women Read between the Lines," "Smart Women..."etc.

Smart Women Store

I realize that this company is more or less using a marketing ploy, but I just love the products anyway.

And I won't feel guilty because:

"Capitalism isn't about welcoming women into the fold, or using our newfound economic clout to make changes in the way the system works. It's about making money. It's about tapping into what really is a very new and powerful phenomenon - the woman who makes enough to pay the rent and several credit card balances, but is young enough to be free of major money-sucking responsibilities - and channeling her for its own ends. So go on, go buy cute things. Buy cute things you want. But make sure you know why you want them. Retail therapy works only if you know what you're trying to cure." - Rita Hao, "And Now a Word from Our Sponsors - Feminism for Sale," BITCHfest: Ten Years of Cultural Criticism from the Pages of Bitch Magazine.

I know why I want to buy the products: because they are cute, not because I'm under any delusion that the company cares more about feminism than it does money.

Anyway, I think Smart Women actually is -at least partly - more than a marketing ploy, because they are affiliated with the League of Women Voters, and that's something, and they have rather decent links on their Web site. But they're still trying to make a profit.

Monday, June 11, 2007

Bitch!

"There is a dangerous myth going around this country that sexism doesn't exist anymore, that we have gotten past it and that 'alarmist' feminists are an outdated nuisance. Warnings like 'Oh, watch out - here comes the feminazi!' abound in our culture, as if for a woman, entitling yourself to an opinion puts you on a par with followers of the Third Reich." - Margaret Cho, from her foreword to BITCHfest: Ten Years of Cultural Criticism from the Pages of Bitch Magazine

I am only past the introduction, but already I am in love with this book! Something modern, finally! Plus, the loveliness of picking and choosing which articles I want to read, if I don't have time to read it cover to cover (although, I think I will have time, since it's fabulous).

"I believe that a thinking person in today's society can be driven mad by isolation." - Margaret Cho, same as above.

So needs to be a caption for something of mine.

Sunday, June 03, 2007

Eastern Conference Champs!

!!!!!!!

LeBron has lived up to the hype


I am excited, but I also can't believe it. Oh, LeBron, you have the hopes of an entire city on you now (as always, but now more than ever before).

It's hard to believe LeBron is only 22 years old most of the time, but then you see him smile and celebrate after a victory, and there it is.

Friday, April 27, 2007

And yet it isn't in the "news"...

John Kerry: Building 7 Was Deliberately Demolished

    At a recent speaking engagement in Austin Texas, Senator John Kerry responded to a question about WTC Building 7 by concluding that according to his information, the building was brought down as a result of a controlled demolition, directly contradicting the official line that the structure fell as a result of fire and debris damage.

    WTC Building 7 was a 47-story building in the WTC complex that collapsed at 5:20pm on September 11. The building had been structurally reinforced and was not hit by a plane yet collapsed in a uniform implosion within its own footprint in a matter of seconds after sustaining relatively light debris and fire damage following the collapse of the twin towers.

Thursday, April 26, 2007

Diane Warren.

I am a bit of a music snob. But even I love to sing along to those
sappy, pop love songs. The other day, while watching Oprah, I
learned that most of these "classics" are written by one person:
Diane Warren! Dude. Check out her Wikipedia page for
a (partial!) list of her songs. I can’t believe how many hits she has
had! And for a (somewhat) variety of artists, pop, country, R&B,
rock, etc. And I thought some of these artists wrote their own
songs, but nope.

"Most of Warren's songs deal with romantic themes. In spite of
that, she has never been married and says she has never been in
love and does not enjoy dating."

Huh!

But seriously. "Because You Loved Me"? I admit it. I love that song. And she wrote it about her dad, who always supported her, especially when her mom didn’t.

Some others:

-Several songs for the Pussycat Dolls and Milli Vanilli! (hilarious)
-"Can't Fight the Moonlight," recorded by LeAnn Rimes
-"Don't Turn Around," recorded first by Tina Turner and later by Ace of Base
-"How Can We Be Lovers?" recorded by Michael Bolton
-"I Get Weak," recorded by Belinda Carlisle
-"I Learned From The Best," recorded by Whitney Houston
- "If I Could Turn Back Time," recorded by Cher (Again, I admit to loving to sing along to this song)
- "Numb," recorded by Pet Shop Boys
- "There You'll Be," recorded by Faith Hill
-"Un-Break My Heart," recorded by Toni Braxton
-"When I See You Smile" by Bad English

Apparently she’s writing Whitney Houston’s comeback song. I hope it’s awesome, in that pop-ish, mainstream way.

Monday, April 16, 2007

"And the world spins madly on..."

Gunman kills 21 on Virginia Tech campus

    A White House spokesman said President Bush was horrified by the rampage and offered his prayers to the victims and the people of Virginia.

    "The president believes that there is a right for people to bear arms, but that all laws must be followed," spokeswoman Dana Perino said
How completely inappropriate. How completely effing inappropriate. The blood isn't even dry yet, and he's spouting political bullshit.

32 people are dead. I don't understand the world.

Thursday, April 12, 2007

Sex and the City! and #4 and #5

Okay. This post is mostly going to be about material objects, because I've had enough debates for the week (Rosie, of all people, standardized testing, Imus...etc.), and I just want to indulge myself.

So, good things.

I finally won the complete set of Sex and the City through E-Bay! Soon, I will joyously watch all six seasons whenever I want! I paid $82, and considering it retails for $200 - $300, not bad. It's supposed to be brand new and sealed and in English, so if I get some burned DVDs or some packaging from Japan, I will be pissed.

I was one of the first 5,000 to sign up for a tote bag filled with goodies from Oprah! Yes! I've never been so happy about a freebie. This one and the coffee pot, which I don't and probably will never use, are the two coolest ever.

I need to update my album collection, most notably with The Story by Brandi Carlile. I love her music. Listen to her!

***

I read the following novels lately, both for my book club:

The Thirteenth Tale by Diane Setterfield
The Time Traveler's Wife by by Audrey Niffenegger

Both novels had such great premises, but both fell flat, I think. Highly overrated, the both of them.

***

I received a letter from Congressman LaTourette in response to this e-mail. Same old, same old, but he at least pretends to listen to his constituents.

Friday, March 16, 2007

Oh, really?

Suspected Leader of 9/11 Attacks Is Said to Confess

Incidentally, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed also confessed to being the shooter on the grassy knoll, the father of Anna Nicole Smith’s baby, and the man who cut you off on the freeway yesterday. Bastard!

Awesome.

Valerie Plame is my hero.

Thursday, March 15, 2007

Big Exit.

http://911scholars.org/

I don't know, but I just don't understand 7 WTC.

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Seriously?

I was watching Paula Zahn's show on CNN last night...I don't know why I bother. I turned it off after the first discussion, because I was so disgusted.

Zahn was talking with three men--and I don't know what qualified any of them to speak on the topic--about the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy and Pace's recent comments that homosexuality is "immoral."

One of the two black men on the "panel," after hearing some (probably) bogus statistic that 58 percent of people in the armed forces say they would be distracted or some rot by a gay person in their unit, said he was going to follow their opinion in this instance. He said if they thought homosexuals would hurt the cohesion of the armed forces, then homosexuals shouldn't be allowed in the armed forces.

Can he see the irony in his statements? Does he realize that the same thing was said about black
people--that at one point people tried to keep black people out of the armed forces because they would hurt its "cohesion"?

I can't stand it. I can't stand it when people who are discriminated against do the exact same thing to someone else. The pathetic excuse of "disrupting the cohesion" has been used against black people, women, and homosexuals.

Women still don't have the opportunity to have equal roles in the armed forces. Why can't we die for your lies, too, Bush?

Can you imagine how foolish I would look if *I*, as a woman, went around saying that homosexuals shouldn't be allowed to be "out" in the armed forces because it would hurt its "cohesion"? Do people ever think that maybe the people who are oh-so-distracted should be
the ones kicked out of the armed forces?

Monday, March 12, 2007

#3

I forgot to add this book I read in February:

The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl by Timothy Egan

This book has so many details and names, they're hard to keep track of it. I did read it very quickly, though, which surprised me. This book would be a good read for history buffs. I don't remember learning about the Dust Bowl in school.

!

60 degrees tomorrow. I am wearing a skirt. Yea for no more icky winter clothes (although, apparently it's going to be colder again at the end of the week)!

Sorry for all of the posts. I'm B-O-R-E-D.

Brown.

I am so underwhelmed by Sherrod Brown.

Has he even spoke during his term yet? I just shot off an e-mail to him about it.

We can't become complacent.

Things from Work.

Just because it's legal for a government body to ban public comments during their meetings doesn't mean they should or that it's a good idea.

Just because it's your blog and you can do whatever you want doesn't mean you should delete all comments of opposing views.

Open government, open blogs. Same, same.

***

I accidentally referred to "post-partum depression" when I meant "post-traumatic stress disorder" today. It took me five minutes to realize it, and I corrected myself, v. embarrassed.

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Acting.

From imdb.com:

    McAvoy Defends Hathaway Casting

    British star James McAvoy has defended Anne Hathaway's casting as Jane Austen in Becoming Jane - insisting "you find the actor, not the accent" for movie roles. Director Julian Jarrold was criticized for casting an American actress in the role of the iconic 18th century English author, but The Last King Of Scotland star believes Hathaway was the best choice for the part. He says, "I think (the criticism was) fairly expected, but I'm a Scotsman and it's really surreal playing two Scottish people in the last seven years, so I haven't got a leg to stand on. I think you find the right actor - you don't find the right accent - and she is undoubtedly brilliant. When you find a British person playing JFK or some real big American icon, nobody bats an eyelid here. We don't go, 'This is terrible - it should be an American man playing this part', so I don't know why we get so annoyed."
THANK YOU.

I don't who does it--I don't know if it's simply the media stirring up trouble or if actual citizens complaining--but whenever a non-British person is cast to play a "British" person, a huge stink is made about it (see Renee Zellweger in just about any role, Anne Hathaway in this role, no one but Brits allowed to be cast in Harry Potter, etc., etc.).

It's called ACTING. Please get over it. Non-Americans are cast as Americans all of the time (see Jude Law, Nicole Kidman, Russell Crowe, Hugh Laurie, almost all everyone in the latest Batman movie, which is a hugely American franchise, etc., etc., etc.) and no one complains about it here. People here are HAPPY about it. We don't CARE. Maybe because we understand the concept of acting...?

So please, get rid of that chip on your shoulder. It's so tiresome.

Friday, March 02, 2007

Peace!



(Just a clip of it...)

Gone for a year...

Interesting happenings at Kent State University, my Alma mater, lately.

Professor accused of writing jihad blog

The Web site in question, because it mentions the link in the print version of the Daily Kent Stater, but I don't see the sidebar in the online version: Global War.

The blog that started the hoopla by Mike Adams.

I'm disturbed by some of the comments to this blog. Don't mess with KSU, punks.

For example, this comment:

    "For all interested. I'm from the Cleveland area and a local talk show host, Bob Frantz spent the morning stirring this one up. He's looking at some ways to go after the University.

    ...

    Many callers arguing that Pino has the freedom of speech right to call for Jihad against America.

    Caller claimed to be a grad student and teacher at the University who is seriously considering not returning next semester if Kent sticks to defending the Pino.

    Frantz stated that in an article in the Kent Stater newspaper, Pino referred to his students as "My beloved Taliban".

    Frantz is calling for alumnus to quit contributing to the school and for parents to consider pulling their kids out.

    44 posted on 03/01/2007 10:27:54 AM PST by mmichaels1970"
Go after the university? What the hell, people.

And this gem:
    "Sounds like Kent State needs another visit from the National Guard

    Crosby Stills Nash & Young need another hit record.

    42 posted on 02/28/2007 7:58:22 PM PST by WKB"
Classy. < / sarcasm >

I don't know enough about the situation to comment regarding Pino, but I just don't appreciate anyone attacking Kent State.

One thing, though. I believe in free speech, but when does free speech become actions? Is this classroom account (third paragraph from the bottom of the page) true? If so, has Pino crossed more than just a boundary of free speech? I'm bothered by this alleged set up of a student.

But, yeah. Unless he's done something illegal, I don't support firing him. Get real. If professors were fired for trying to shame a student about their religion or force their beliefs on students, quite a few of the professors at Kent State would be fired. In one of my English classes, there was only one self-identified Christian, because we were actually ASKED in an ENGLISH class, and she constantly had to defend herself and her views from the professor. In an ENGLISH class. I was embarrassed and angry for her. It goes both ways, that freedom of religion thing. Especially when it has nothing to do with what we're supposed to be learning.

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Re: Oscars.

Okay, no matter who would have won, someone would complain. But I can't stand people saying that Martin Scorsese only won an Oscar for his past work and for sentimental reasons.

Who cares if The Departed is his best film or not? The only criteria for winning an Oscar this year is what is the best film *this year.

My favorite film this year was Little Miss Sunshine. Yes, I would have liked to see it win, but it was a long-shot because the Academy doesn't generally award comedies. So my second choice would have been The Departed--not because I necessarily loved it (it is most definitely not for everyone: violent, crass, etc.) but because I think it was the (second) best film of the ones nominated.

The film some people feel should have won is Babel, which is mind-boggling to me because a) I read a lot of negative reviews about it when it first came out and b) I saw this exact film last year, and it even won an Oscar, but it was called Crash at the time and took place in Los Angeles.

****

Okay. I am embarrassed to admit it, but I'm obsessed with Leonardo DiCaprio lately. It upsets me that sometimes he's brushed off as merely a pretty boy when he's such a classy person and such a talented actor. Yeah, he had some silly movie choices when he was young--he even admits it--but he has an amazing resume now. I think he is someone who is going to be considered a legend, a la Clark Gable or Cary Grant. He's old school. I mean, did you see him at the Oscars? Unlike Eddie Murphy, who threw a hissy fit when he lost and left the ceremony, DiCaprio stood up and applauded when Forest Whitaker won instead of him and seemed moved by his speech. On the red carpet he went up to people and told him how great their performances were and etc. He's just very genuine in a surprising way.

I’ve watched four movies of his movies in the past couple of weeks: The Departed, The Gangs of New York, Catch Me if You Can, and The Aviator. Catch Me if You Can and The Aviator are both brilliant, underrated movies. Catch Me if You Can has always been a personal top favorite. DiCaprio should have won the best actor Oscar for The Aviator instead of Jaime Foxx, in my opinion.

But why does he have to die in 80% of his movies?!

I also love Mark Wahlberg lately.

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

...

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
--Benjamin Franklin

Friday, February 23, 2007

And you are...?

"The top score on the list below represents the faith that Belief-O-Matic, in its less than infinite wisdom, thinks most closely matches your beliefs. However, even a score of 100% does not mean that your views are all shared by this faith, or vice versa.

Belief-O-Matic then lists another 26 faiths in order of how much they have in common with your professed beliefs. The higher a faith appears on this list, the more closely it aligns with your thinking."

*******

1. Reform Judaism (100%)
2. Unitarian Universalism (97%)
3. Liberal Quakers (95%)
4. Sikhism (78%)
5. Bahá'í Faith (77%)
6. Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestants (76%)
7. Neo-Pagan (74%)
8. Orthodox Judaism (73%)
9. Islam (66%)
10. Mahayana Buddhism (66%)
11. New Age (66%)
12. Jainism (63%)
13. Secular Humanism (61%)
14. Theravada Buddhism (61%)
15. Orthodox Quaker (52%)
16. New Thought (51%)
17. Hinduism (45%)
18. Scientology (45%)
19. Taoism (43%)
20. Nontheist (40%)
21. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) (37%)
22. Mainline to Conservative Christian/Protestant (31%)
23. Eastern Orthodox (29%)
24. Roman Catholic (29%)
25. Seventh Day Adventist (29%)
26. Christian Science (Church of Christ, Scientist) (28%)
27. Jehovah's Witness (28%)

*******

The Unitarian Universalism and Liberal Quakers aren't a surprise--I actually have been thinking of attending a UU church lately--but Reform Judaism came from left field. Or, I just hadn't known such a thing existed.

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Monday, February 19, 2007

Letters sent to my congressmen.

*******

Senator Voinovich:

I have been following the recent story in the Washington Post about the horrific conditions at Walter Reed by Dana Priest and Anne Hull. I am appalled and sicked at the way our veterans are treated.

What are you going to do about these conditions?

The Republicans are supposedly so focused on "supporting the troops," but look at how the Republicans in power in Washington, D.C. treated them when they came home and the cameras were off.

Why aren't the Republicans noticing this matter? Why didn't you, the head of the ethics committee, ever notice anything? I hope you are ashamed.

I am outraged. And I become even more outraged when I don't see any of my elected officials stand up against this horror.

It is time for you, as an elected offical and as a human being, to demand an inquiry into why we cannot deliver health care to our veterans.

If you cannot fight this issue and draw attention to the lack of support given our troops by President Bush's adminstration--and by your own party members--then you do not deserve to hold your position.

Thank you,

[my name]

*******

Senator Brown:

I have been following the recent story in the Washington Post about the horrific conditions at Walter Reed by Dana Priest and Anne Hull. I am appalled and sicked at the way our veterans are treated.

What are you going to do about these conditions?

The Republicans are supposedly so focused on "supporting the troops," but look at how the Republicans in power in Washington, D.C. treated them when they came home and the cameras were off.

Why aren't the Republicans noticing this matter? Why aren't the Democrats?

I am outraged. And I become even more outraged when I don't see any of my elected officials stand up against this horror.

It is time for you, as an elected offical and as a human being, to demand an inquiry into why we cannot deliver health care to our veterans.

If you cannot fight this issue and draw attention to the lack of support given our troops by President Bush's adminstration then you do not deserve to hold your position.

Thank you,

[my name]

*******

Representative LaTourette:

I have been following the recent story in the Washington Post about the horrific conditions at Walter Reed by Dana Priest and Anne Hull. I am appalled and sicked at the way our veterans are treated.

What are you going to do about these conditions?

The Republicans are supposedly so focused on "supporting the troops," but look at how the Republicans in power in Washington, D.C. treated them when they came home and the cameras were off.

Why aren't the Republicans noticing this matter?

I am outraged. And I become even more outraged when I don't see any of my elected officials stand up against this horror.

It is time for you, as an elected offical and as a human being, to demand an inquiry into why we cannot deliver health care to our veterans.

If you cannot fight this issue and draw attention to the lack of support given our troops by President Bush's adminstration--and by your own party members--then you do not deserve to hold your position.

Thank you,

[my name]

*******

Interesting.

Required reading from the Washington Post:

Who hates the troops?

Sunday, February 18, 2007

I love the smell of...

Oh, I love the smell of an American-bashing in the morning.

I know Americans have a lot of "privilege." But what I cannot tolerate is Europeans and Canadians acting like they don't also have "privilege." And, frankly, I would rather have the privilege of Canadians than Americans. What's better, universal health care or the so-called "strongest" military (and it just cracked me the eff up when a CANADIAN said how "terrified," yes, terrified was the word, they were of our guns. Yeah, we're coming after you next, punks.)?

Today there was a post on the feminist community at livejournal about cultural appropriation. A white woman was asking if it were offensive for her to put her hair in dreadlocks. Frankly, that post didn't really belong on the community because it's to do with race, not gender.

Someone, we'll call her Hypocrite, wrote this comment:

    But you know something? I just read through the rest of this thread and had a bit of a think about it. And I realised that yep, you people are completely right. Why do I think so? Because of how much it grates on me when American people who have never even seen my country (Ireland, that is) claim to know more about my culture than I do, or take up little things from my country and culture and try to make them their own- when they've never set foot in the place. It's offensive, and it's ignorant.
I just had to write something back to her, because she really grated on my nerves. I'll explain why later.
    Yeah, it's so ignorant and offensive for people to celebrate their heritage. But I guess I must be wrong in thinking that there are a lot of people of Irish descent in America.
Not my best stuff, or even much of an argument, but she just annoyed me. I just think she's overblowing things.

Hypocrite wrote this comment in reply:
    Yes, people of Irish descent. Celebrating being a person of Irish descent is one thing. Assuming that, although neither you* nor your parents have ever stepped foot in the country, that you can tell me about my country, culture, heritage, political situation and politics, is very much another.

    Irish-Americans are just that- American people of Irish descent. My great-grandmother was Spanish. I am not. My upbringing, my culture, are Irish. Just as Irish-Americans' upbringing and culture are American.

    I've lived most of my life here. I've grown up in this culture. And I've gotten sick to death, in my time, of Americans whose grandparents were Irish attempting to pass themselves off as Irish people, while understanding nothing below a surface level about my country and culture.
After this comment, I decided I didn't want anything to do with someone who gets so hysterical (I'm sure SO MANY PEOPLE act like that with her). So I simply wrote back:
    Wow. There's so much I could reply to this, but since this is a feminist community, it would be way off topic.
You know what bothered me about her? Heaven forbid that anyone be allowed to touch anything to do with Ireland unless they actually live on the soil. By the by, she also doesn't think African-Americans should consider themselves "African." I just think she's very ignorant about the lives of immigrants and their descendants. She's negating people's heritage, and acting like the immigrant experience didn't shape their descendents. But mostly, mostly she annoyed me because EUROPEANS TELL ME ABOUT MY LIFE AS AN AMERICAN ALL THE TIME. They know more about me than I do, apparently!

I thought she was a hypocrite. And she proved me right.

This next post went up in the feminist community:
    American Privilege Checklist?

    I've searched the community memories and all over Google, and I cannot for the life of me find an American privilege checklist. I'm sure I once read one that was either on feminist or linked to from here, but now all I can find is this one article, which is good, but I'm looking for a more extensive list of specific examples.

    So, does anyone know where to find one? Alternately, it'd be great if members could just comment here with instances of American privilege. The one that most readily comes to mind for me is the privilege to be ignorant about America itself - the past, the government, the effects on the world, et cetera - as well as the privilege to be completely ignorant about the rest of the world. (Thanks to conuly for pointing this out.)

    Thanks in advance for any help.
Yes. The feminist community needs a post strictly about American privilege. No post for Caucasian privilege. No post for European privilege. No post for "first world" privilege. Or "developed country" privilege. Or "English-speaking" privilege. Those never get talked about, because apparently they don't exist. Just American. Because we are the only ones with privilege.

Hypocrite wrote:
    I can't be specific, but the most general thing I've noticed is the effects of American cultural hegemony on many American people.

    If you're not American, you're bombarded with American culture from day one. If you're American, you don't get that.

    What I've noticed is the fact that many Americans just don't think to acknowledge that their viewpoints are culturally biased.

    There's also an attitude towards other cultures that's less "othering" and more.. I can't figure out the word. It's like a simplified, dumbed-down version of other cultures- often including the one that the person in question is descended from. An assumption that growing up hearing stories about "Culture/Country X" means that one is entitled to see themselves as a member of that culture.

    Actually, to be honest, I can see elements of American privilege coming out even in that article. The assumption that Americans have more "freedom" than people in other countries is one which is very pervasive indeed. And, in some cases, blatantly false.

    Most definitely.

    I don't envy the US in the slightest. In particular, as a queer person, I have far more protections under Irish law than I would under US law. I am protected from discrimination in the workplace, I am protected from discrimination when attempting to access goods and services. While my country honours freedom of expression, Incitement to Hatred is illegal.

    As a member of a minority, I feel a lot more free than in the US. My country at least attempts to protect every citizen's freedom to live free from discrimination- whereas in the US, the right to discriminate and to hate speech appears to be enshrined in "freedom of speech".

    Here, we are free to have our opinions and to express them- but when that expression incites violence and hatred, we are no longer protected.

    Also, throughout my country it is illegal for employers and service providers to discriminate with regards race, gender, marital status, family status, sexual orientation, disability, membership of the Traveller community (an Irish ethnic and cultural minority) age once one is over 18, or religion. Again, the law is on the side of the person who could be discriminated against- not the person wishing to use "freedom of expression" to justify discrimination. Again, as a member of a minority, it sure does feel good to know that, unlike in some areas of the US, it is illegal for a prospective employer to refuse me a job or to fire me because I'm queer. Or because I'm a woman. Or because I'm an agnostic. Or if I were to get pregnant. Or... or..

    So yes.
    Probably preaching to the choir here, but: Yep.
AMAZING.

I wanted to comment to her with this post:
    Oh, the hypocrisy.

    So, "you can tell me about my country, culture, heritage, political situation and politics"?

    I thought there was something in the U.S. called Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act that all make it illegal to make employment decisions based on sex, race, age, religion, or ethnic group, or disabilities or etc., but I guess I'm wrong. What do I know; I just live here.
SHE IS A HYPOCRITE.

I didn't leave that comment because it's the popular thing to bash Americans in this community, and I didn't feel like getting harassed.

I KNOW I am privileged as an American. I'm just so sick of everyone acting like they don't have some form of privilege, too. I know I'm kind of wrong here. Don't tell me how, because I'm not in the mood. But I'm also kind of right. Why does everyone get to tell me what my life is like? Why do they get to tell me what my PERSONALITY is like? I'm sick of it. I'm sick of American-bashing being okay in this community. We are damned if we do, damned if we don't. I'm sick of the post-Bush era. I'm sick of being hated for things I don't do or have no control over. I'm sick of being hated sight-unseen by someone who is just as ignorant as they claim I am. I'm just sick of people ASSUMING, ASSUMING, ASSUMING. I'm sick of everyone painting everyone with the same brush.

UGH. I just hate how hypocritical people are.

And these posts days after someone made a series of oh-so-hysterical jokes about the U.S. trying to annex Canada and Mexico. They may have been funny, except for the massive, unintended irony of being told by someone from jolly, ol' "sun never sets on our empire" England.

Thursday, February 15, 2007

The Experiment--Take Two.

Well. That experiment was quick.

I requested "Not Ready to Make Nice" again today.

I received this reply from the DJ:

    "I can play the Dixie Chicks just not that song ~ it must fit in our format Sorry"
How doesn’t it fit your format? You don’t play award-winning songs? How is it different than any other Dixie Chicks songs? Because it’s less "country"? Shouldn’t that make it more compatible with your format, since it’s more pop and light rock-ish? Your station is basically Vh-1 on the radio—and they play the "Not Ready to Make Nice" music video. I guess the difference is that they’re aren’t owned by bigot Clear Channel.

They are playing "Landslide" by the Dixie Chicks, right this minute, though, as a replacement. It will be the last song I hear on this station.

…right after my second request of "Train in Vain" by the Clash.

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

The Experiment.

I am conducting an experiment with one of my local radio stations. This particular station plays mostly pop and "light rock" music. They are also owned by Clear Channel, who was behind many country music stations banning the Dixie Chicks (because Clear Channel is based in Texas, etc., and owns some 1,000 radio stations).

This radio station plays many "crossover" country artists, so I wanted to determine if they would play the Dixie Chicks, specifically their newer songs.

During their request hours, I requested "Not Ready to Make Nice" by the Dixie Chicks from one e-mail address; five minutes later, I requested "Thunder Road" by Bruce Springsteen from another e-mail address (I had to make the song distinctive enough, so I would know it wasn't requested by someone else).

My logic is that if they played Springsteen’s song and not the Dixie Chicks’ song, obviously the Dixie Chicks must be banned from this station, too (I actually think they do play the Dixie Chicks on a local country music station, as I’m sure I’ve heard "Wide Open Spaces" lately; again, though, would they play "Not Ready to Make Nice"? That’s an experiment for another time).

Unfortunately, neither request was played today. Possibly I made the requests too late—maybe too many were already ahead of me.

I am going to make two song requests every day until I determine for one way or another if they will play the Dixie Chicks.

****

Bush-gems from today’s press conference:

    "Money trumps peace."

    "I don't know what's going in Iraq because I'm in this beautiful White House."

Thursday, January 25, 2007

Jane Eyre.

I just finished watching parts one and two of the new Jane Eyre miniseries (yea for DVR), and it is fabulous.

I love the woman playing Jane (Ruth Wilson); she's not too pretty, not too plain. I love her expressions.

I can't wait until the rest next Sunday, because obviously that's the best part with all of the drama and etc.

I think this adaptation is the best Jane Eyre I've seen--but then, they have a lot more time to work with! I was smiling like a fool during the scene where Jane tells Rochester she has to leave for two weeks, and they argue over the money and Jane is smiling and eeeee!

Ugh. I made the mistake of reading some of the message boards on imdb.com about the movie. I should have known better, though, because every discussion, about any movie or TV show, dissolves into how horrible American movies/actors/people etc., etc., etc. are. I just want to read about a movie. Thanks.

Now someone needs to make a great version of Wuthering Heights (my favorite novel of all time). I love the one with Laurence Olivier, but it's not really Wuthering Heights. The other versions aren't worth mentioning.